Sex and Violence

Sex and violence:  like male and female, they are best and worst when together. They are nothing alike yet have everything in common.  Their intercourse is natural and innately dramatic.  There is no artistic theme which stirs us like the union of sex and violence.
Intensity frightens the timid and inspires the bold.  It is always exciting, regardless.  Masculine aggression and feminine sensuality are each strong in their own right... but strongest when together.  Male and female are meant to copulate.  Sex and violence are intrinsically linked.
In our art and literature, typically and traditionally, men are warriors and women are victims. The male falls in battle and the female is murdered.  Of course there are "exceptions" but the gist of the heterosexual dynamic remains true.  Yes, a fictional man may be murdered, but he shall not be remembered lest his death was somehow his glorious end in a struggle.  Perhaps a heroine is the slayer of men... but only because she is wearing the pants of her legendary brethren.  Ultimately, the mainstay is the theme of the man as the "white knight" and the woman as the "damsel in distress."  Why?  Because nature gave man the "sword."  Yes, the truth of it is as simple as that.  Sex and violence in art and literature are the perfect storm of our primal nature.  Enjoy the sublimation thereof.

    
 https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/ShawnOToole

Sexual Malice

Heterosexuality is a predator-prey relationship.  I know women want to be strong, but to be "female" is to be designated for penetration.  As all heterosexual men know: there is no greater indignity than to have another person's body shoved into yours.  When we want a woman, we want her to be our victim, to do unto her something worse than killing her.  Yes, for us real men, there are things worse than death.  Why can women relate to male homosexuals?  As victims, they have so much in common.  Men always "want it" because we are instinctively striving for a quantity of offspring.  Women are meant to be "frigid" so as to ensure quality offspring.  Sluts are frowned upon because they do not give balance to the flow.  Yes, there is rhyme and reason to our courting silliness.
If I were mindless, I would rape everything female in sight.  I would kill at a whim.  I am not an animal... but my body is.  I am mindful of my impulses.  I sublimate them into energy for productive endeavors. I draw upon them for strength and inspiration.  As a human being I am beyond my primal nature.  That said, my aggressive, sexual drives are always with me.  I would have it no other way.             

Armed and Helpless

I am a connoisseur of the obscure "useless henchwomen" motif.  In summary: the theme is that of comely female antagonist thugs or soldiers being easily and readily subdued.  The women are preferably armed and uniformed.  They must be plentiful and expendable.  I favor them being mass-produced clones.  They are employed as guards and enforcers but prove to be helpless victims.
"Useless henchwomen" are the villainous variant of the "damsel in distress" and "scream queen."  Like their sisters, they are female archetypes whose niche is to be imperiled.  Unlike them, however, they are supposedly "deserving" of their distress.  Useless henchwomen are underlings of villainy, thus, it is "justified" for them to be slain and or humiliated.  They are anonymous, insignificant pawns who are exploited and sacrificed in the service of an elitist agenda:  in the manner of the chafing reality decried by modern feminism.
Heroines and villainous dominatrixes thrill us by being awesome.  Damsels in distress and useless henchwomen entertain us by being helpless.  Humanity, despite its thin veneer of sophistication, remains innately primal.  Our formidable female archetypes appeal to our impulsive submission to maternal figures. Our fictional female victims are the objects of heterosexual aggression, even if the assailant portrayed is female.

   
https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/ShawnOToole